Search for: All records

The gyroscope like dichloride complexes trans -Pt(Cl) 2 (P((CH 2 ) n ) 3 P) ( trans -2; n = c, 14; e, 18; g, 22) and MeLi (2 equiv.) react to yield the parachute like dimethyl complexes cis -Pt(Me) 2 (P((CH 2 ) n ) 3 P) ( cis -4c,e,g, 70–91%). HCl (1 equiv.) and cis -4c react to give cis -Pt(Cl)(Me)(P((CH 2 ) 14 ) 3 P) ( cis -5c, 83%), which upon stirring with silica gel or crystallization affords trans -5c (89%). Similar reactions of HCl and cis -4e,g give cis / trans -5e,g mixtures that upon stirring with silica gel yield trans -5e,g. A parallel sequence with trans -2c/EtLi gives cis -Pt(Et) 2 (P((CH 2 ) 14 ) 3 P) ( cis -6c, 85%) but subsequent reaction with HCl affords trans -Pt(Cl)(Et)(P((CH 2 ) 14 ) 3 P) ( trans -7c, 45%) directly. When previously reported cis -Pt(Ph) 2 (P((CH 2 ) 14 ) 3 P) is treated with HCl (1 equiv.), cis - and trans -Pt(Cl)(Ph)(P((CH 2 ) 14 ) 3 P) are isolated (44%, 29%), with the former converting to the latter at 100 °C. Reactions of trans -5c and LiBr or NaI afford the halide complexes trans -Pt(X)(Me)(P((CH 2 ) 14 ) 3 P) ( trans -9c, 88%; trans -10c, 87%). Thermolyses and DFT calculations that include acyclic model compounds establish trans > cis stabilities for all except the dialkyl complexes, for which energies can be closely spaced. The σ donor strengths of the non-phosphine ligands are assigned key roles in the trends. The crystal structures of cis -4c, trans -5c, trans -7c, and trans -10c are determined and analyzed together with the computed structures. 

Two routes to the title compounds are evaluated. First, a ca. 0.01 M CH 2 Cl 2 solution of H 3 B·P((CH 2 ) 6 CH=CH 2 ) 3 ( 1 ·BH 3 ) is treated with 5 mol % of Grubbs' first generation catalyst (0 °C to reflux), followed by H 2 (5 bar) and Wilkinson's catalyst (55 °C). Column chromatography affords H 3 B·P( n- C 8 H 17 ) 3 (1%), H 3 B· P ((CH 2 ) 13 C H 2 )( n -C 8 H 17 ) (8%; see text for tie bars that indicate additional phosphorus–carbon linkages, which are coded in the abstract with italics), H 3 B· P ((CH 2 ) 13 C H 2 )((CH 2 ) 14 ) P ((CH 2 ) 13 C H 2 )·BH 3 ( 6 ·2BH 3 , 10%), in,out -H 3 B·P((CH 2 ) 14 ) 3 P·BH 3 ( in,out - 2 ·2BH 3 , 4%) and the stereoisomer ( in,in / out,out )- 2 ·2BH 3 (2%). Four of these structures are verified by independent syntheses. Second, 1,14-tetradecanedioic acid is converted (reduction, bromination, Arbuzov reaction, LiAlH 4 ) to H 2 P((CH 2 ) 14 )PH 2 ( 10 ; 76% overall yield). The reaction with H 3 B·SMe 2 gives 10 ·2BH 3 , which is treated with n -BuLi (4.4 equiv) and Br(CH 2 ) 6 CH=CH 2 (4.0 equiv) to afford the tetraalkenyl precursor (H 2 C=CH(CH 2 ) 6 ) 2 (H 3 B)P((CH 2 ) 14 )P(BH 3 )((CH 2 ) 6 CH=CH 2 ) 2 ( 11 ·2BH 3 ; 18%). Alternative approaches to 11 ·2BH 3 (e.g., via 11 ) were unsuccessful. An analogous metathesis/hydrogenation/chromatography sequence with 11 ·2BH 3 (0.0010 M in CH 2 Cl 2 ) gives 6 ·2BH 3 (5%), in,out - 2 ·2BH 3 (6%), and ( in,in / out,out )- 2 ·2BH 3 (7%). Despite the doubled yield of 2 ·2BH 3 , the longer synthesis of 11 ·2BH 3 vs 1 ·BH 3 renders the two routes a toss-up; neither compares favorably with precious metal templated syntheses.